Total Pageviews
Indiae
About Me
- Dr.Ujjal.K.Pal
- Kolkata, West bengal, India
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(36)
- December (1)
- November (1)
- October (1)
- August (2)
- July (5)
- June (3)
- May (2)
- April (7)
- March (7)
- February (4)
- January (3)
-
►
2011
(132)
- December (4)
- November (6)
- October (7)
- September (12)
- August (14)
- July (13)
- June (11)
- May (16)
- April (19)
- March (14)
- February (11)
- January (5)
Saturday, December 15, 2012
Assembly Scuffle!
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Kolkata Film Festival 2012
Saturday, October 27, 2012
Not donating pledged body!
Friday, August 24, 2012
Friday, August 17, 2012
In jest oinly!
Sunday, July 22, 2012
In jest only!
Monday, July 16, 2012
Consistent!
1)Consistency!
Son:Knowing fully well Sonia Gandhi wouldn't accept Gopal Krishna Gandhi or Krishna Basu as vice presidential candidate, why did Didi propose their names?
Dad: Only to show she's honestly and sincerely consistent.
Son: How?
Dad: Didi's so far opposed every proposal mooted by PM or Sonia Gandhi.
2)ATM machine:
Son:In mass molestation incident in Assam Police came late at the spot and when questioned DGP said "Police are not like ATM machines so that whenever you insert card money will instantly come out".
Dad:Analogy is imperfect, my boy.
Son:Why dad?
Dad:Of course, police are like ATM machines but with frequent link failures.
3)Stitch in times!
Son:Dad, imagine sweepers are reportedly engaged in stitching wounds, pushing injections etc in govt hospitals.
Dad: See, I find nothing wrong in it.
Son:Why? Dad: Who cooks does hair too, goes the Bengali proverb!.
Thursday, July 12, 2012
Smile, please!
Thursday, July 5, 2012
Smile a day!
Monday, July 2, 2012
In lighter vein!
1)Fortune:
Son:Dad, they say crime does not pay.
Dad:Yes, my son.
Son:But dad, many hard-core criminals have made huge fortune and got never punished.
Dad; This is because fortune favours the brave.
2)Green chilly:
Son:Dad,why is green chilli selling at exorbitantly high prices in the market?
Dad:Because our Food minister has banned use of red chilli.
3)Prez Poll:
Son:Knowing fully well he'll lose why's Sangma contesting Prez poll?
Dad: It's Sangma's not-to-win-but-to-take-part spirit, my son!
4)Euro Cup:
Son: Dad, why did Italy fare so badly in Euro Cup Final?
Dad: Spain played and Italy enjoyed their(Spain's) play, my son.
Saturday, June 30, 2012
In lighter vein only!
Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Pez Poll
Thursday, June 7, 2012
Fitness test and a tragic death!
Monday, May 28, 2012
Freedom at Midnight
Thursday, May 10, 2012
Drug Scam!
Sunday, April 29, 2012
Changed Stance!
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Merger of Mouzas with GTA?
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Taxi ride at night!
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Hate Campaign!
The food minster Jyotipriya Mallick's advisory to boycott CPM is nothing new.It's TMC's policy long since.When in opposition no TMC leader did share dais with their CPM counterpart even by mistake.It so happened a TMC leader made a u-turn at the sight of a CPM minister present on the stage at a certain occasion.It's for this reason TMC member never did attend all party meet convened by Left front govt.In fact, there was a standing instruction from TMC supremo to avoid CPM by all means.CPM too called upon their cadres to socially boycott the opponents, in a very subtle way of course, particularly in rural areas.What's very interesting is Mamata Banerjee did never so openly asked her cadres or leaders to ostracize CPM as Mr.Mallick has done.What's more,unlike Mr.Mallick Mamata Banerjee did never so vociferously issued dictum to her cadres not to go in for marital relation with CPM or boycott them socially in all respects.Nor has she ever said CPM need be hated otherwise revenge can't be taken on them like Mr.Mallick.This hate campaign is very dangerous as it might aid and abet political violence.This part of Mr.Mallick's statement would not be certainly approved of by Chief Minister herself.
Saturday, April 7, 2012
Transfer of Ms.Damayanti Sen
Though govt claims transfer of Damayanti Sen, Joint Commissioner of
Police(Crime) is just a routine affair, people are not ready to buy
this argument.In view of Ms.Sen's painstaking efforts to have made a
break-through in Park Street rape case ,which Mamata Banerjee claimed
to be a concocted story to malign her govt, she should have been
allowed to continue in her present position till the investigation was
complete as the main culprit is still absconding.Instead of doing that
Ms.Sen has been transferred to a less important post at Barrackpore
.One may be afraid the on-going enquiry in the rape case might suffer
a set back because the present incumbent in Ms.Sen's post might not
dare take that initiative as Sen considering her fate.Mamata took
this decision deliberately to defy public sentiment as well a section
of press that is highly critical of some of her activities and
illogical utterances.In fact, it betrays her egoistic attitude.
It may be pointed out during Left Front regime Prasun Mukherjee, the
then Commissioner of Police had to relinquish his post under the
pressure of public and media as well in view of his unwanted remark
in Rizwanur Rahaman's death case.Incidentally, Mamata Banerjee who was
then in opposition lent her full throated support to the demand to
remove Commissioner of Police from his position.But now public
opinion to have Damayanti Sen to continue in her present position to
pusue the Park Street rape case has been more hounered in defiance by
Miss.Banerjee as a Chief minister.
However, if Damayanti sen were transferred to a post that is more
challenging than the present one, it could have been a consolation
that she's atleast received appreciation for her skill and efficiency
as a police officer.But her present posting as DIG(training) at
Barrackpore might send a wrong signal to people that she's been
tranferred to a position of lesser cosequence as she proved
Miss.Banerjee wrong in Park street rape case.
Police(Crime) is just a routine affair, people are not ready to buy
this argument.In view of Ms.Sen's painstaking efforts to have made a
break-through in Park Street rape case ,which Mamata Banerjee claimed
to be a concocted story to malign her govt, she should have been
allowed to continue in her present position till the investigation was
complete as the main culprit is still absconding.Instead of doing that
Ms.Sen has been transferred to a less important post at Barrackpore
.One may be afraid the on-going enquiry in the rape case might suffer
a set back because the present incumbent in Ms.Sen's post might not
dare take that initiative as Sen considering her fate.Mamata took
this decision deliberately to defy public sentiment as well a section
of press that is highly critical of some of her activities and
illogical utterances.In fact, it betrays her egoistic attitude.
It may be pointed out during Left Front regime Prasun Mukherjee, the
then Commissioner of Police had to relinquish his post under the
pressure of public and media as well in view of his unwanted remark
in Rizwanur Rahaman's death case.Incidentally, Mamata Banerjee who was
then in opposition lent her full throated support to the demand to
remove Commissioner of Police from his position.But now public
opinion to have Damayanti Sen to continue in her present position to
pusue the Park Street rape case has been more hounered in defiance by
Miss.Banerjee as a Chief minister.
However, if Damayanti sen were transferred to a post that is more
challenging than the present one, it could have been a consolation
that she's atleast received appreciation for her skill and efficiency
as a police officer.But her present posting as DIG(training) at
Barrackpore might send a wrong signal to people that she's been
tranferred to a position of lesser cosequence as she proved
Miss.Banerjee wrong in Park street rape case.
Monday, April 2, 2012
Dream will come true?
Mamata and Media:
It's no denying the fact many acts of omissions and commissions of the Left front govt and arrogance of its leaders and cadres brought about its fall.Another factor that mostly contributed to end Left rule was the decision of the Left to pull out support from the central govt and make an unsuccessful attempt to topple it.As a result TMC and Congress unitedly fought the Left in Assembly polls.But the third factor that was in no way less important than the earlier ones was the role of media.Since Nandigram episode both print and electronic media made all out attack on the LF govt.No doubt govt deserved such onslaught from Press.But the Press was far less mild in its criticism of Mamata Banerjee when she staged dharna totally blocking Durgapur express way for as many as thirteen days.Press was equally soft with Miss.Banerjee when she insisted on return of 400 acre of land to the so called unwilling farmers from Nano project site. Mamata Banerjee's sustained agitation and her continued adherence to her demand for return of land ultimately drove Tatas out Of Bengal with their automobile project after ninety percent of work done to Gujarat.She made her demand a prestige issue rather than consider the interest of the state.What's more even after frustrating a near complete project Miss. Banerjee didn't draw flak from press the way she deserved.What's very interesting is media continually spewed venom on the Left( however, the Left deserved it) making them villain and extended full-throated support to Miss Banerjee. Primarily, Left's lapses and media support combine brought Mamata in power with absolute majority.It should be reckoned with Mamata's sustained efforts backed up by unfailing media support made her a charismatic leader.It'd not be an over statement Mamata was sometimes pampered by media.
After Mamata came to power media were all- praise for her almost from day one.Her every movement was monitored and generously lauded.Normally during honeymoon period Press maintains a good relation with the ruling party.But in this case the relation was too good.Now Mamata has fallen from grace of a section of press,of course for her own fault and is sometimes subjected to scathing criticism.As a pampered child can't tolerate any body's criticism, may it be for his or her good, similar is the case with Mamata. Her ears are tuned to listen to praise only from the obsequious press.So any criticism sound cacophonous to her.As the all powerful leader of her party and govt where other members,even ministers, are practically non entity,it's no wonder she'd have intolerant mind-set that breeds authoritarian attitude.So when criticised she sees red and behaves irrationally.She often makes unbridled utterances that put her on the spot.She hardly reverses her decision or withdraws her comments even made inadvertently.It hurts her ego.These are all authoritarianism syndromes.Her win in every battle (mostly one-sided) with the Center has made her all the more confident that hers is the last word.
What's very interesting is her entourage are sometimes more aggressive than her perhaps to curry favour with her.In recent press censorship issue Sisir Adhikari's statement and the most arrogant body language is a case in point. Intolerance and confrontational attitude of ruling party has vitiated the political ambiance of the state and adversely affected the developmental activities govt has under taken.Pepole brought this govt with massive mandate to see Poribatan(change) and expected peace and tranquility would prevail and ruling party and the opposition would work in tandem for the progress of the state.But they are already disillusioned to a great extent.Nevertheless we hope, may it be hoping against hope, good sense would dawn on the ruling party and real Poribartan that we dreamt of would usher in.
It's no denying the fact many acts of omissions and commissions of the Left front govt and arrogance of its leaders and cadres brought about its fall.Another factor that mostly contributed to end Left rule was the decision of the Left to pull out support from the central govt and make an unsuccessful attempt to topple it.As a result TMC and Congress unitedly fought the Left in Assembly polls.But the third factor that was in no way less important than the earlier ones was the role of media.Since Nandigram episode both print and electronic media made all out attack on the LF govt.No doubt govt deserved such onslaught from Press.But the Press was far less mild in its criticism of Mamata Banerjee when she staged dharna totally blocking Durgapur express way for as many as thirteen days.Press was equally soft with Miss.Banerjee when she insisted on return of 400 acre of land to the so called unwilling farmers from Nano project site. Mamata Banerjee's sustained agitation and her continued adherence to her demand for return of land ultimately drove Tatas out Of Bengal with their automobile project after ninety percent of work done to Gujarat.She made her demand a prestige issue rather than consider the interest of the state.What's more even after frustrating a near complete project Miss. Banerjee didn't draw flak from press the way she deserved.What's very interesting is media continually spewed venom on the Left( however, the Left deserved it) making them villain and extended full-throated support to Miss Banerjee. Primarily, Left's lapses and media support combine brought Mamata in power with absolute majority.It should be reckoned with Mamata's sustained efforts backed up by unfailing media support made her a charismatic leader.It'd not be an over statement Mamata was sometimes pampered by media.
After Mamata came to power media were all- praise for her almost from day one.Her every movement was monitored and generously lauded.Normally during honeymoon period Press maintains a good relation with the ruling party.But in this case the relation was too good.Now Mamata has fallen from grace of a section of press,of course for her own fault and is sometimes subjected to scathing criticism.As a pampered child can't tolerate any body's criticism, may it be for his or her good, similar is the case with Mamata. Her ears are tuned to listen to praise only from the obsequious press.So any criticism sound cacophonous to her.As the all powerful leader of her party and govt where other members,even ministers, are practically non entity,it's no wonder she'd have intolerant mind-set that breeds authoritarian attitude.So when criticised she sees red and behaves irrationally.She often makes unbridled utterances that put her on the spot.She hardly reverses her decision or withdraws her comments even made inadvertently.It hurts her ego.These are all authoritarianism syndromes.Her win in every battle (mostly one-sided) with the Center has made her all the more confident that hers is the last word.
What's very interesting is her entourage are sometimes more aggressive than her perhaps to curry favour with her.In recent press censorship issue Sisir Adhikari's statement and the most arrogant body language is a case in point. Intolerance and confrontational attitude of ruling party has vitiated the political ambiance of the state and adversely affected the developmental activities govt has under taken.Pepole brought this govt with massive mandate to see Poribatan(change) and expected peace and tranquility would prevail and ruling party and the opposition would work in tandem for the progress of the state.But they are already disillusioned to a great extent.Nevertheless we hope, may it be hoping against hope, good sense would dawn on the ruling party and real Poribartan that we dreamt of would usher in.
Sunday, April 1, 2012
Small is Beautiful!
They say Small is Beautiful. Didi also finds beauty in small.So it's no wonder Didi would recommend only small news papers for public reading in govt aided libraries.She claims it's a 'small' decision..She actually means it's the 'beautiful' decision of her Ma, Mati and Manus govt.Didi also believes as the big fishes deavour the small ones,similarly big news papers engulf the small ones.It means small news papers are neglected in presence of big ones in libraries.If the leading dailies are removed from the reading rooms of public libraries readers would be left with no choice but to read small and lesser circulated news papers and thus they would gradually develop the habit of reading these dailies.That apart,the monetary allocation of public libraries is so limited it can't afford funds to buy big news papers which are costlier than small ones.What's more, to stand by big publishing houses of news dailies is as good as carrying coal to Newcastle.However, Times of India is only an exception and inclusion of Ajkaal indiactes Didi is above Dalatantra as the latter is supposed to believe in Left ideology.
Perhaps, Didi believes the small papers promote free thinking while big papers badly influence and vitiate people's mind against the establishment.In that sense these dailies are out and out anti- people and duly merit total boycott.Govt should launch awareness program to teach people which books or newspapers they should read and which not.This attempt would be made to allay the prevailing confusion in people's psyche against the govt..Not only that big papers grandiosely promote consumerism and make the gullible 'Ma' & 'Manus' of our 'Mati' greedy and corrupt.
Some people clamour that govt has stopped or minimised offering ads to small news papers and it has put them in sheer financial constraints.In fact, it's wrongly interpreted by the detractors of the present govt.It has been done only to give them opportunity to struggle with poverty and ultimately stand on their own leg.It's Darwinian theory of 'survival of the fittest'.
Perhaps, Didi believes the small papers promote free thinking while big papers badly influence and vitiate people's mind against the establishment.In that sense these dailies are out and out anti- people and duly merit total boycott.Govt should launch awareness program to teach people which books or newspapers they should read and which not.This attempt would be made to allay the prevailing confusion in people's psyche against the govt..Not only that big papers grandiosely promote consumerism and make the gullible 'Ma' & 'Manus' of our 'Mati' greedy and corrupt.
Some people clamour that govt has stopped or minimised offering ads to small news papers and it has put them in sheer financial constraints.In fact, it's wrongly interpreted by the detractors of the present govt.It has been done only to give them opportunity to struggle with poverty and ultimately stand on their own leg.It's Darwinian theory of 'survival of the fittest'.
Friday, March 30, 2012
An authoritarian attitude!
Circular for keeping selected news papers in public libraries:
The tone and tenor of Mamata Banerjee's statement made with some selected TV channels are quite alarming as it unmistakably reeks of authoritarian mind-set.She lashed out at the larger section of media that vehemently keeps criticising her govt's recent move to select a few news papers those should be only kept at govt and govt aided libraries for public reading.She claimed she's not as yet asked people what to read and what not to, but if the press continues attacking her this way, she threatened, she'd even do that.Though initially her govt argued these particular news papers were chosen to 'promote free thinking' but now stance has changed.She claims the move has been made to promote financially weak news papers.However, later inclusion of Times of India in the list, a news paper from the most affluent publishing house, finds no explanation.Miss Banerjee refers to the circular of Library department as the 'small circular' of a 'small department' .But it's deliberately blown out of proportion to malign her govt and stall all developmental activities her govt has embarked upon, she alleged.There's a deep rooted conspiracy behind the present concerted attack on her by the politicians and a section of press as well, she fumed.
The tone and tenor of Mamata Banerjee's statement made with some selected TV channels are quite alarming as it unmistakably reeks of authoritarian mind-set.She lashed out at the larger section of media that vehemently keeps criticising her govt's recent move to select a few news papers those should be only kept at govt and govt aided libraries for public reading.She claimed she's not as yet asked people what to read and what not to, but if the press continues attacking her this way, she threatened, she'd even do that.Though initially her govt argued these particular news papers were chosen to 'promote free thinking' but now stance has changed.She claims the move has been made to promote financially weak news papers.However, later inclusion of Times of India in the list, a news paper from the most affluent publishing house, finds no explanation.Miss Banerjee refers to the circular of Library department as the 'small circular' of a 'small department' .But it's deliberately blown out of proportion to malign her govt and stall all developmental activities her govt has embarked upon, she alleged.There's a deep rooted conspiracy behind the present concerted attack on her by the politicians and a section of press as well, she fumed.
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Press Censorship@Public Libraries
There's no room for intolerance in democracy.Unfortunately, the present govt in our state is too intolerant.It can't stand criticism at all.It's so much so that it's instructed the govt and govt aided libraries to keep eight selected dailies only for public reading.Incidentally, these chosen papers blindly support every move of the govt irrespective of its merit. On the other hand, the leading and the most widely circulated dailies those have incurred the displeasure of the govt and hence are denied entry to these libraries criticise govt activities in no uncertain terms whenever needed.But govt want press to be docile and sycophant.It'd eulogise the ruling party in every issue.
In fact, the press that blindly endorses whatever govt do does more harm than good and govt is misled as a result.Press should act as the watch dog and mince no words in criticising the wrong policies of the govt.On the other hand, press would not fall short of lauding and encouraging the govt either when it do good job.In fact,all authoritarian rulers consider even the constructive criticism of press as hostility and try to gag its voice.It's no wonder Mamata Banerjee with her full dictatorial temperament would do the same.However,such activities of the govt would certainly send wrong signal to people and adversely affect its support base.
Interestingly, people normally go to public libraries to read most of the papers those have been banned .If these leading papers are not available the readership of dailies in public libraries is likely to drastically fall.That apart,the major and national dailies are preserved in library archives for reference reading in future particularly by researchers.If the entry of these dailies are prohibited , how could they be preserved in archives?That apart,govt can't dictate as to what to read and what not to.It's as good as infringement of fundamental right.
In fine, the govt is requested. to rescind the order immediately in public interest as well as for its own good.
In fact, the press that blindly endorses whatever govt do does more harm than good and govt is misled as a result.Press should act as the watch dog and mince no words in criticising the wrong policies of the govt.On the other hand, press would not fall short of lauding and encouraging the govt either when it do good job.In fact,all authoritarian rulers consider even the constructive criticism of press as hostility and try to gag its voice.It's no wonder Mamata Banerjee with her full dictatorial temperament would do the same.However,such activities of the govt would certainly send wrong signal to people and adversely affect its support base.
Interestingly, people normally go to public libraries to read most of the papers those have been banned .If these leading papers are not available the readership of dailies in public libraries is likely to drastically fall.That apart,the major and national dailies are preserved in library archives for reference reading in future particularly by researchers.If the entry of these dailies are prohibited , how could they be preserved in archives?That apart,govt can't dictate as to what to read and what not to.It's as good as infringement of fundamental right.
In fine, the govt is requested. to rescind the order immediately in public interest as well as for its own good.
Friday, March 23, 2012
Fire in the city!
Fire breaks out almost everyday in the city.In most cases fury of fire is devastating and it engulfs wide area making innumerable people destitute.In some cases fire has taken heavy toll of lives too.In fact,fire has spared none, right from patients in modern corporate hospital to slum dwellers.
After each incidence of major fire break-out administration embark upon some knee-jerk measures to prevent fire.They visit high rises and large establishments to see if people properly maintain fire safety norms and have fire detecting and fighting devices.In most cases they're disappointed by utter indifference of the management there regarding fire safety.In some old buildings electrical wiring is in such a bad shape that cluster of wires dangle menacingly causing concern for fire breakout by short circuit at any moment. Fire department caution them against being so callous about safety and advise them to duly follow fire norms.But all suggestions fall flat on the deaf ear and things go on as usual till a major fire breaks out again some where.
Kolkata is a pretty old city and so it is built mostly in unplanned way.Particularly North Kolkata is so congested that space between two buildings and approach roads as well are so narrow that fire engines can't enter many areas to combat fire.In most places lack of water badly affect fire fighting.In fact, to minimize the incidences of fire many old building and new high rises as well need be demolished but it's no practical proposition.Occurrences of fire should be controlled with in the present frame work.For it what's most needed is public awareness and sustained efforts of the administration.Let us hope our collective determination would make it possible the devastating fire at Hatibagan is the last episode of major fire in the city.
After each incidence of major fire break-out administration embark upon some knee-jerk measures to prevent fire.They visit high rises and large establishments to see if people properly maintain fire safety norms and have fire detecting and fighting devices.In most cases they're disappointed by utter indifference of the management there regarding fire safety.In some old buildings electrical wiring is in such a bad shape that cluster of wires dangle menacingly causing concern for fire breakout by short circuit at any moment. Fire department caution them against being so callous about safety and advise them to duly follow fire norms.But all suggestions fall flat on the deaf ear and things go on as usual till a major fire breaks out again some where.
Kolkata is a pretty old city and so it is built mostly in unplanned way.Particularly North Kolkata is so congested that space between two buildings and approach roads as well are so narrow that fire engines can't enter many areas to combat fire.In most places lack of water badly affect fire fighting.In fact, to minimize the incidences of fire many old building and new high rises as well need be demolished but it's no practical proposition.Occurrences of fire should be controlled with in the present frame work.For it what's most needed is public awareness and sustained efforts of the administration.Let us hope our collective determination would make it possible the devastating fire at Hatibagan is the last episode of major fire in the city.
Monday, March 19, 2012
An Insipid End Of Budget Drama!
Resignation of Dinesh Trivedi:
It started with a fanfare but ended in a fiasco.Yes, Rail budget drama started with a high pitch but ended in a a tame note. Dinesh Trivedi could not stick to his stand that unless Mamata Banerjee herself or Prime minister asked him to resign he would not step down.On the contrary he himself contacted Mamata Banerjee simply to be asked to quit railway ministry with immediate effect and he did it as a 'disciplined soldier'.He heaped praise on TMC supremo and did swear unwavering faith in party leadership.In fact, he could have resigned immediately after his party chair person made it known to the Prime minister that she didn't want him to continue as Rail minister any more.It's not clear why he took unnecessarily so much time to call it quits.May be,he expected Congress leadership would stand by him as Prime minister and Finance minister lauded his budget.Pranab Mukherjee in particular supported fare-hike by thumping table.But in reality none in the govt dared extend active support to him and rather projected it as a personal matter between Mamata Banerjee and Dinesh Trivedi. Mamata Banerjee had the last laugh.
Now it's up to Mamata Banerjee(defacto Railway minister) to dictate to what extent roll-back in fare hike would be made or there would be no fare-hike at all. What's, perhaps, certain is hapless Prime minister has no choice but to accept Mukul Ray as Railway minister notwithstanding his strong reservation against him.
It started with a fanfare but ended in a fiasco.Yes, Rail budget drama started with a high pitch but ended in a a tame note. Dinesh Trivedi could not stick to his stand that unless Mamata Banerjee herself or Prime minister asked him to resign he would not step down.On the contrary he himself contacted Mamata Banerjee simply to be asked to quit railway ministry with immediate effect and he did it as a 'disciplined soldier'.He heaped praise on TMC supremo and did swear unwavering faith in party leadership.In fact, he could have resigned immediately after his party chair person made it known to the Prime minister that she didn't want him to continue as Rail minister any more.It's not clear why he took unnecessarily so much time to call it quits.May be,he expected Congress leadership would stand by him as Prime minister and Finance minister lauded his budget.Pranab Mukherjee in particular supported fare-hike by thumping table.But in reality none in the govt dared extend active support to him and rather projected it as a personal matter between Mamata Banerjee and Dinesh Trivedi. Mamata Banerjee had the last laugh.
Now it's up to Mamata Banerjee(defacto Railway minister) to dictate to what extent roll-back in fare hike would be made or there would be no fare-hike at all. What's, perhaps, certain is hapless Prime minister has no choice but to accept Mukul Ray as Railway minister notwithstanding his strong reservation against him.
Saturday, March 17, 2012
Democracy at a stake!
Asking Dinesh Trivedi to resign:
As the things stand Dinesh Trivedi might have to relinquish railway portfolios at the instance of Mamata Banerjee who feels let down by her party colleague for hiking train fares .As railway minister Miss Banerjee put railways on the dock and bade farewell to passengers' safety and security.Mr.Trivedi has made an honest ,sincere and realistic approach to recover the financial health of railways instead of playing to the gallery like his predecessor.For doing this job first of all money is required and to enhance revenue he's hiked train fares.He's enhanced fares marginally at lower classes and at higher rates for AC and sleeper coaches keeping in mind that poor people too can afford the enhanced fare.What's more, people in general don't grudge to cough up the extra fare considering the moribund state of Indian railways.They rather hope rail could now ensure them safe,secure and hassle- free journey.Nothing could be more unfortunate if Dinesh Trivedi has to quit now simply because Mamata Banerjee does not like him while whole nation is behind him.Even Prime minister Monmohan Singh has complimented him for presenting a rational budget.Trivedi's departure might go down as a dark spot in the history Indian democracy.
Again, what's most humiliating and insulting for Monhmohan singh that Mamata Banerjee has recommended the name of Mukul Ray as railway minster to replace Dinesh Trivedi.It's Mukul Roy who outright defied Monmohan Singh when he asked Mr.Ray, the then minister of state for railways, to visit the site of train accident due to bomb blast at Assam.
As the things stand Dinesh Trivedi might have to relinquish railway portfolios at the instance of Mamata Banerjee who feels let down by her party colleague for hiking train fares .As railway minister Miss Banerjee put railways on the dock and bade farewell to passengers' safety and security.Mr.Trivedi has made an honest ,sincere and realistic approach to recover the financial health of railways instead of playing to the gallery like his predecessor.For doing this job first of all money is required and to enhance revenue he's hiked train fares.He's enhanced fares marginally at lower classes and at higher rates for AC and sleeper coaches keeping in mind that poor people too can afford the enhanced fare.What's more, people in general don't grudge to cough up the extra fare considering the moribund state of Indian railways.They rather hope rail could now ensure them safe,secure and hassle- free journey.Nothing could be more unfortunate if Dinesh Trivedi has to quit now simply because Mamata Banerjee does not like him while whole nation is behind him.Even Prime minister Monmohan Singh has complimented him for presenting a rational budget.Trivedi's departure might go down as a dark spot in the history Indian democracy.
Again, what's most humiliating and insulting for Monhmohan singh that Mamata Banerjee has recommended the name of Mukul Ray as railway minster to replace Dinesh Trivedi.It's Mukul Roy who outright defied Monmohan Singh when he asked Mr.Ray, the then minister of state for railways, to visit the site of train accident due to bomb blast at Assam.
Friday, March 16, 2012
To Editor,The Bengal Post
The queer logic presented by your correspondent Niranjan Hazra in his write-up (March16) Trivedi has violated the collective will of the people has surprised me a lot.What he's said boils down to the moot point that by hiking train fare in railway budget he's betrayed his party and the people who support it.The party is always dead against such hike particularly in the interest of poor people.As he's won election on TMC's ticket and not as an independent candidate he should have toed his party's line of not affecting people's interest by any means in his budgetary proposals.What Mr.Hazra has missed is Dinesh Trivedi is not a minister of a particular party, he's a cabinet minster of UPA -II govt.So his budget proposals should reflect the policy and principles of UPA-II govt and not of TMC or of any other party in particular.Although in a coalition govt different partners might have different policies but the govt is run on common minimum program.In fact, Dinesh Trivedi has taken a bold decision of hiking train fares after so many years to augment the financial health of railways.People too don't grudge to cough up the extra fare considering the morbid condition of Indian rail ways which now fail to ensure minimum safety to the passengers.Thanks to Mr.Trivedi he has not followed the populist policy far divorced from ground realities adopted by his predecessor.Trivedi has, in fact, respected the collective will of the people who want railways to assure them safe, secure and hassle free journey.
Tuesday, March 13, 2012
Appeasing farmers
Mamata Banerjee has called upon the cooperative banks not to confiscate the property of a farmer and put it on auction if he fails to repay his bank loan.She's also declared that she'd amend such legal provision enjoyed by banks.She's also added she'd file FIR against the bank which has issued notice to attach mortgaged property of defaulter farmers.As usual she's lambasted the Left Front govt for passing such anti farmer draconian law, although such a legal provision was in vogue much before the Left came to power.Perhaps, a series of suicides recently committed by debt trapped farmers in the state has prompted CM to make such a populist statement as a damage control measure.That apart,Panchayet election is not far off and now it's time to look after the rural vote bank.
A dispassionate review of CM's statement suggests it's not only populist but irrational also.It'll encourage the farmers not to repay loan even if they 're able to do so.It's as good as asking the banks to waive the debts of the farmers irrespective of their financial position.If the banks have to oblige CM, how would they run their institutions?A time would come when the cooperative banks would be compelled to roll down their shutters or refuse to sanction loans to the farmers for their own survival.As a result the farmers will have to approach the money lenders to take loan at an exorbitantly high rate of interest.So CM should think twice before making such a populist statement to appease the farmers with an eye to their vote bank.In fact,in doing so she'll do more harm than good to the farmers whose interest she's apparently going to vindicate.
A dispassionate review of CM's statement suggests it's not only populist but irrational also.It'll encourage the farmers not to repay loan even if they 're able to do so.It's as good as asking the banks to waive the debts of the farmers irrespective of their financial position.If the banks have to oblige CM, how would they run their institutions?A time would come when the cooperative banks would be compelled to roll down their shutters or refuse to sanction loans to the farmers for their own survival.As a result the farmers will have to approach the money lenders to take loan at an exorbitantly high rate of interest.So CM should think twice before making such a populist statement to appease the farmers with an eye to their vote bank.In fact,in doing so she'll do more harm than good to the farmers whose interest she's apparently going to vindicate.
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Jumping the gun!
They say man learns from mistakes.But our CM Mamata Banerjee is an exception.She never tries to learn from mistakes because she doesn't believe she can commit any mistake at all.Park Street rape case proved her wrong as she'd claimed it was concocted.Incidence of rape is a very sensitive issue, so she should have been more cautious while making any comment on Katwa rape incident.But here too she made the similar remark as in Park Street case, this time, of course ,based on medical test though doctors claim this preliminary test does prove nothing unless the result of forensic test is received.Doctors are, in fact, waiting for the results of forensic test.As these uncalled-for remarks are coming from no lesser a person than CM herself, it might have a far reaching impact on investigation.Investigating agency might be influenced and try to prove CM was not wrong in her observation as all cops are not that courageous as Damayanti Sen.CM did jump the gun in murder cases too.Recently,immediately after dastardly incidence of twin murders at Bardwan she claimed from Delhi it was the fall-out of internal squabble of CPM while her ministers claimed murders were the result of mob fury.What's most significant is in these murder cases cops didn't even pray for police custody of the accused as is normally done.In each instance she should have made remark after the investigation was complete to do justice to the victim.What's more, yesterday during ALL India General strike when a journalist of a private TV channel was brutally assaulted by Trinomool activists she also called it concocted to malign her party and govt..
What's very disturbing is Mamata Banerjee always finds CPM's presence behind every untoward incidents or crimes taking place in the state.She seems obsessed that CPM is working overtime to do harm to her government and thus embarrass her.So she passes not a single day without spewing fire and brimstone on CPM for some reason or other and some times without any rhyme and reason..May be it's paranoia syndrome but it proves very costly for our state.Such a sour relation between the ruling party and the opposition stands in the way of developmental activities of the state.In a democracy govt and ruling party should respect each other and work in tandem for the progress of the state.As ill luck would have it in the last Left regime too TMC and the Left were at daggers drawn and state suffered a lot.We're afraid the same thing would happen in the changed regime too.
What's very disturbing is Mamata Banerjee always finds CPM's presence behind every untoward incidents or crimes taking place in the state.She seems obsessed that CPM is working overtime to do harm to her government and thus embarrass her.So she passes not a single day without spewing fire and brimstone on CPM for some reason or other and some times without any rhyme and reason..May be it's paranoia syndrome but it proves very costly for our state.Such a sour relation between the ruling party and the opposition stands in the way of developmental activities of the state.In a democracy govt and ruling party should respect each other and work in tandem for the progress of the state.As ill luck would have it in the last Left regime too TMC and the Left were at daggers drawn and state suffered a lot.We're afraid the same thing would happen in the changed regime too.
Sunday, February 19, 2012
Courageous Fight For Justice
Park street rape case:
We’re happy that adverse comments from high places of administration could not influence the police investigation as feared in the Park Street rape case and ultimately it could be successfully cracked. It’s the untiring efforts and doggedness of some dedicated police officers that yielded results. The rape victim’s courage and unfaltering adherence to her complaint that she was assaulted and raped even in the face of disbelief prevailing in some quarters convinced the investigating officers that some mischief was done to her.However, initially cops at police station didn’t take her statement seriously and on the contrary misbehaved with her, she alleged. Perhaps, matter could have ended there hadn’t the electronic media brought such a dastardly incident to light. So, thanks to media for playing a pivotal role that prodded the cops to swing into action.
The incident has laid bare our attitude to a rape victim. Many of us questioned her character as if women of questionable character deserve to be raped. That apart, it’s revealed how custodian of law behaves with a woman in distress, particularly in case of sexual assault. Now the question arises how safe are women in our society.
In fine, congrats to the victim whose courage and indomitable spirit would inspire other women to come forward and fight for justice if any sexual assault is made on them.
We’re happy that adverse comments from high places of administration could not influence the police investigation as feared in the Park Street rape case and ultimately it could be successfully cracked. It’s the untiring efforts and doggedness of some dedicated police officers that yielded results. The rape victim’s courage and unfaltering adherence to her complaint that she was assaulted and raped even in the face of disbelief prevailing in some quarters convinced the investigating officers that some mischief was done to her.However, initially cops at police station didn’t take her statement seriously and on the contrary misbehaved with her, she alleged. Perhaps, matter could have ended there hadn’t the electronic media brought such a dastardly incident to light. So, thanks to media for playing a pivotal role that prodded the cops to swing into action.
The incident has laid bare our attitude to a rape victim. Many of us questioned her character as if women of questionable character deserve to be raped. That apart, it’s revealed how custodian of law behaves with a woman in distress, particularly in case of sexual assault. Now the question arises how safe are women in our society.
In fine, congrats to the victim whose courage and indomitable spirit would inspire other women to come forward and fight for justice if any sexual assault is made on them.
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Prescribing Generic names
Central govt is reportedly going in for making it mandatory for
doctors to prescribe generic names of drugs instead of trade names.The
move is apparently a welcome one as it would curb the alleged practice
of the pharmaceutical companies to woo doctors by cash and kind to
promote sale of their drugs.That apart drug dealers will not have to
keep a host of drugs of same generic names but of different trade
names at their shops.Not only that, they'd require to make less
monetary investment to run their business and much less space would be
needed too.As different pharmaceutical companies sometimes supply a
drug of same formulation at mindbogglingly widely varying prices the
consumer would have now the choice to opt for one that costs less.So
for patients drugs will not be as costly as they are now.
There's also the flip side of the coin.In our country vigilance on
drug manufacturing is not at all satisfactory.So efficacy of the
same drug prepared by different companies is not always the same.The
reputed pharmaceutical companies generally maintain the required
quality of a drug perhaps for their sophisticated infrastructural
facilities and their product also normally cost high. On the other
hand, the lesser known companies who sell drugs at cheaper price
sometimes fail to maintain proper standard as they can't afford that
sophistication in drug manufacturing.Of course it's not always
true.Sometimes many cheaper formulations have the same efficacy as the
costlier ones.Again, there is menace of spurious drugs.All these
problems can be sorted out if there's proper vigil on drug
manufacturing companies to ensure that quality control is rigorously
followed.That apart, vigil should be also kept on the drug stores to
check sale of spurious drugs.Each drug store should compulsorily have
a qualified pharmacist.
doctors to prescribe generic names of drugs instead of trade names.The
move is apparently a welcome one as it would curb the alleged practice
of the pharmaceutical companies to woo doctors by cash and kind to
promote sale of their drugs.That apart drug dealers will not have to
keep a host of drugs of same generic names but of different trade
names at their shops.Not only that, they'd require to make less
monetary investment to run their business and much less space would be
needed too.As different pharmaceutical companies sometimes supply a
drug of same formulation at mindbogglingly widely varying prices the
consumer would have now the choice to opt for one that costs less.So
for patients drugs will not be as costly as they are now.
There's also the flip side of the coin.In our country vigilance on
drug manufacturing is not at all satisfactory.So efficacy of the
same drug prepared by different companies is not always the same.The
reputed pharmaceutical companies generally maintain the required
quality of a drug perhaps for their sophisticated infrastructural
facilities and their product also normally cost high. On the other
hand, the lesser known companies who sell drugs at cheaper price
sometimes fail to maintain proper standard as they can't afford that
sophistication in drug manufacturing.Of course it's not always
true.Sometimes many cheaper formulations have the same efficacy as the
costlier ones.Again, there is menace of spurious drugs.All these
problems can be sorted out if there's proper vigil on drug
manufacturing companies to ensure that quality control is rigorously
followed.That apart, vigil should be also kept on the drug stores to
check sale of spurious drugs.Each drug store should compulsorily have
a qualified pharmacist.
Thursday, February 2, 2012
Freedom of expression
The way the Booksellers and Publishers Guild cancelled publication of
Taslima Nasrin's book Nirbasan at Kolkata Boimela is shameful and
shocking too.Guild cowed down to the threat of a fundamentalist group
not to publish the book.Govt too yielded to the threat as instruction
to stop publication of Taslima's Nirbasan came from Lalbazar.Police
administration apprehended law and order problem in case the book was
published at Boimela.How can a section of people infringe upon the
freedom of expression of others?Can they dictate which people should
not read?Definitely not.Freedom of expression is our fundamental
right.Perhaps Guild at Kolkata Boimela and govt as well took cue
from Jaipur Literature Festival where Salman Rushdie's invitation to
the Fair was ultimately cancelled lest it could rue a section of
Muslim fundamentalists at election time.It's unfortunate that
sometimes vote bank determines our freedom of expression.
Taslima Nasrin's book Nirbasan at Kolkata Boimela is shameful and
shocking too.Guild cowed down to the threat of a fundamentalist group
not to publish the book.Govt too yielded to the threat as instruction
to stop publication of Taslima's Nirbasan came from Lalbazar.Police
administration apprehended law and order problem in case the book was
published at Boimela.How can a section of people infringe upon the
freedom of expression of others?Can they dictate which people should
not read?Definitely not.Freedom of expression is our fundamental
right.Perhaps Guild at Kolkata Boimela and govt as well took cue
from Jaipur Literature Festival where Salman Rushdie's invitation to
the Fair was ultimately cancelled lest it could rue a section of
Muslim fundamentalists at election time.It's unfortunate that
sometimes vote bank determines our freedom of expression.
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Discourteous and dangerous!
Sometimes landlords take recourse to cutting off supply of
electricity to the tenants to make them vacate their house.Publishers
and Booksellers Guild general secretary Tridib Chatterjee also.
embarked upon almost the same plan in case of Imran Khan to terminate
his program at Boi mela yesterday.What's more, he boldly or rather
brazenly made it public to all as if to let everybody know how
intelligently he handled a difficult situation.one wonders how he
conducts such a big event like Boimela with this level of
intelligence.His concept of decency and decorum is also
questionable.Before instructing to switch off the light didn't he once
think a high profile guest like Imran Khan would feel insulted and
humiliated at this bizarre way of cutting short his program?That apart
he exposed Imran to high security risk as any thing untoward could
happen in darkness.Guild secretary could easily request Imran not to
entertain any more question from press as another program is scheduled
at this venue and participants are waiting.
electricity to the tenants to make them vacate their house.Publishers
and Booksellers Guild general secretary Tridib Chatterjee also.
embarked upon almost the same plan in case of Imran Khan to terminate
his program at Boi mela yesterday.What's more, he boldly or rather
brazenly made it public to all as if to let everybody know how
intelligently he handled a difficult situation.one wonders how he
conducts such a big event like Boimela with this level of
intelligence.His concept of decency and decorum is also
questionable.Before instructing to switch off the light didn't he once
think a high profile guest like Imran Khan would feel insulted and
humiliated at this bizarre way of cutting short his program?That apart
he exposed Imran to high security risk as any thing untoward could
happen in darkness.Guild secretary could easily request Imran not to
entertain any more question from press as another program is scheduled
at this venue and participants are waiting.
Sunday, January 29, 2012
Unsavory treatment!
Everybody is equal in the eye of law.In that sense the arrest of
Dr.Mani Chettri in connexion with AMRI tragedy is justified.But law
has its human face too.Dr. Chettri is a nonagenarian with frail
health.His contribution to medical science is indisputable.He's
produced a good number of brilliant doctors who have made their mark
in the field of their specialization.He's devoted his life to the
physical well being of innumerable patients.That apart Dr. Chettri has
been whole heartedly cooperating with the investigating agency since
the AMRI fire incident took place.It's not conceivable why police has
felt it necessary after as many as 45 days to nab him and slap him
with a non bailable offence.Not only that, police even contested his
bail petition.Medical fraternity should vehemently protest against
such a unsavory treatment, may it be legally justified, being meted out to him on
humanitarian ground.
Dr.Mani Chettri in connexion with AMRI tragedy is justified.But law
has its human face too.Dr. Chettri is a nonagenarian with frail
health.His contribution to medical science is indisputable.He's
produced a good number of brilliant doctors who have made their mark
in the field of their specialization.He's devoted his life to the
physical well being of innumerable patients.That apart Dr. Chettri has
been whole heartedly cooperating with the investigating agency since
the AMRI fire incident took place.It's not conceivable why police has
felt it necessary after as many as 45 days to nab him and slap him
with a non bailable offence.Not only that, police even contested his
bail petition.Medical fraternity should vehemently protest against
such a unsavory treatment, may it be legally justified, being meted out to him on
humanitarian ground.
Sunday, January 8, 2012
Double Standard
Manhandling Principals in college campus:
Campus violence in academic arena is nothing new.Students gherao
principal, teachers and the non teaching staff or the members of the
governing body of an academic institution to get their demands
fulfilled.Sometimes they become unruly and go on the rampage too.But
they hardly manhandle teachers. At present roughing up a teacher at
the slightest pretext has been a very common phenomenon.The sights of
a college or school principal being physically assaulted by the
students or outsiders in the campus are really pathetic and barbaric
too.No language is sufficient to condemn such incidents.What's most
unfortunate is the miscreants are not properly dealt with by the
administration.Police make out cases in such a way that the miscreants
are released on bail immediately after arrest.What's more, the main
culprits who're normally big guys are not even arrested at all for
their political influence.Not only that, the top administration
unabashedly and openly play down such occurrences and describe it as
just aberration.Isn't it as good as pampering the criminals?
So far as the police action is concerned, unashamed discrimination is
made most probably based on political complexion.In Raigunj College
incident police slapped the culprits who incidentally belong to TMC with bailable offence for assaulting principal while at Majdia
college, Nadia for the same offence police framed the miscreants
who're reportedly members of SFI with non- bailable offence and sent
to court for trial.
It's high time administration could act properly cutting across party
line to stop such ugly incidents,otherwise we'll see the re-run of
dark days in early seventies.
Campus violence in academic arena is nothing new.Students gherao
principal, teachers and the non teaching staff or the members of the
governing body of an academic institution to get their demands
fulfilled.Sometimes they become unruly and go on the rampage too.But
they hardly manhandle teachers. At present roughing up a teacher at
the slightest pretext has been a very common phenomenon.The sights of
a college or school principal being physically assaulted by the
students or outsiders in the campus are really pathetic and barbaric
too.No language is sufficient to condemn such incidents.What's most
unfortunate is the miscreants are not properly dealt with by the
administration.Police make out cases in such a way that the miscreants
are released on bail immediately after arrest.What's more, the main
culprits who're normally big guys are not even arrested at all for
their political influence.Not only that, the top administration
unabashedly and openly play down such occurrences and describe it as
just aberration.Isn't it as good as pampering the criminals?
So far as the police action is concerned, unashamed discrimination is
made most probably based on political complexion.In Raigunj College
incident police slapped the culprits who incidentally belong to TMC with bailable offence for assaulting principal while at Majdia
college, Nadia for the same offence police framed the miscreants
who're reportedly members of SFI with non- bailable offence and sent
to court for trial.
It's high time administration could act properly cutting across party
line to stop such ugly incidents,otherwise we'll see the re-run of
dark days in early seventies.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)